The documentary right at the start states that Jefferson was a controversial figure. He wrote about liberty for all men, even made several bills on emancipation, but did not free his own slaves. Thus the historians see him as a dichotomy and cannot quite make out what he was, whether a hypocrite or something else entirely. In trying to explain the problem, the historians go into Jefferson's persona. Jefferson is described as a poor speaker and as soft spoken individual. He was also brilliant in being a diplomat, an engineer, a farmer, and an architect. He squandered the first year of college getting caught up in the atmosphere, but after that he studied 15 hours a day. He wrote without notes. He traveled with a chess set and a violin, no ipods, tablets, or ipads in that day, let alone phones. If you wanted music you had to make it yourself. As a consequence, he suffered when he was away from his family cause he heard nothing from them. His wife at the time was in great distress cause her child died. He was quoted as stating, "Every human being must be viewed according for what it is good for, for none of us, no not one, is perfect. And were we to love none who had imperfections, this world would be a desert for our love." He also wrote the Declaration of the United States of America which states that all men are created equal. All these little fact point to some of the empath's or HSP's traits such as loyalty, deep feeling, focused, absorbing environments, and wishing goodness for all men.
In the documentary there were two statements made that affirmed my suspicions on Jefferson. The first said, "Jefferson was an incredibly sensitive man, thin skinned, vulnerable, fragile in character. ...His greatest desire was harmony and to be loved, and couldn't stand not to be loved." This statement alone showed me that the historians in the documentary who studied Thomas Jefferson were giving an accurate account on his personality in that he was indeed highly sensitive. The second statement said, "This was the real Thomas Jefferson, a man who loved deeply, who felt deeply." To me, this seals it, he was highly sensitive. The only way historians can judge a historical figure is by what they did and what they wrote. Jefferson was a brilliant writer.
On the basis of this documentary I believe that Thomas Jefferson, the third President of the United States was indeed a Highly Sensitive Person. The controversy about him and why he didn't do according to how he wrote, I believe, could possibly be found if we understood him as a sensitive. Modern Psychology is not unanimous about the affirmation of HSPs. How then could we expect historians to understand this? Perhaps someone would be crafty enough to make a Myers-Briggs test or some other personality test for historical figures and we could understand them a little better and why they made the choices they did. Understanding personality types would be a great benefit to humanity. As for Thomas Jefferson as an HSP, I think to judge him with our modern lens is a mistake. We cannot change what he did or didn't do, it's history. I believe we now have a little more insight in this historical figure on who's words men are becoming free even today.
I have started reading a biography on Thomas Jefferson by Jon Meacham and then I wondered whether this founding father may have been an empath after all as I recognize some of the HSP traits and characteristics!
ReplyDeleteI have not seen the documentary yet but will definitely do so soon. I'm very glad to know that somebody else thinks likewise. Thanks for posting this!